<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS for SCCM Install. 32bit or 64bit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://verbalprocessor.com/2007/10/31/os-for-sccm-install-32bit-or-64bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2007/10/31/os-for-sccm-install-32bit-or-64bit/</link>
	<description>Jarvis&#039;s Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCCM x64 vs. x86 Update &#171; Tim&#8217;s Whiteboard</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2007/10/31/os-for-sccm-install-32bit-or-64bit/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCCM x64 vs. x86 Update &#171; Tim&#8217;s Whiteboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/os-for-sccm-install-32bit-or-64bit/#comment-235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more diligent about posting to his blog than I am actually posted much of my long standing opinion here. Much to Jarvis&#8217;s chagrin I am going to change my opinion in light of some recent [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more diligent about posting to his blog than I am actually posted much of my long standing opinion here. Much to Jarvis&#8217;s chagrin I am going to change my opinion in light of some recent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

