Comments on: SCCM SQL Cluster Problem http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/02/01/sccm-sql-cluster-problem/ Jarvis's Ramblings Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:19:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Joe http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/02/01/sccm-sql-cluster-problem/#comment-1592 Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:55:08 +0000 http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-1592 Yeah, I see the same problem. I’m using SCCM 2007 SP2 R3. I don’t see the SQL cluster name in my Site Systems.

Just node1 and node2 (with database server roles)…but there is no mention of SQL cluster virtual name.

]]> By: Edward http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/02/01/sccm-sql-cluster-problem/#comment-1307 Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:58:51 +0000 http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-1307 Same story here, didn’t work. Verified kerberos was working on the sql server, ran through the steps outlined in the tech article with the added step of detaching/reattaching, and it still left my named instance as a site system, and the db on both nodes of the cluster…as well as leaving them as component servers and site systems as well. SCCM separates the men from the boys, that’s for sure. What a PITA.

]]> By: Howard http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/02/01/sccm-sql-cluster-problem/#comment-1277 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:53:21 +0000 http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-1277 How did you manage to get SCCM to work with a NAMED sql cluster instance? I’ve been unable to get SCCM console to open up after the database’s been moved to a named instance. It seems to work only with default (ie, unnamed) instances. The Console would just errors out.

]]> By: Karl Kranich http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/02/01/sccm-sql-cluster-problem/#comment-133 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:30:28 +0000 http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-133 Good work!

]]>