<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Password Complexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/</link>
	<description>Jarvis&#039;s Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 08:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crashsystems</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crashsystems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a very good article breaking down the math for passphrase strength, and while reading it thought of this blog post. I&#039;ve posted the link below.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iusmentis.com/security/passphrasefaq/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.iusmentis.com/security/passphrasefaq/&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a very good article breaking down the math for passphrase strength, and while reading it thought of this blog post. I&#8217;ve posted the link below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iusmentis.com/security/passphrasefaq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iusmentis.com/security/passphrasefaq/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First a password generator does exactly that...spits out a string of characters...that you will never be able to consistently remember correctly. The point to the article (and my post) is that a string of words is easy to remember and gives you the added security because of the overall length of the password. And as far as a password generator spitting out a series of words...you will be much more likely to remember your own series of words.

One type of password that I have used on some of my accounts is to use a portion of a Bible verse. So, I could take John 3:16 (probably the best known Bible verse) which reads &quot;For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.&quot; I will always be able to refer to the verse if I forget the password. I then take just a part of the verse and make the password something like &quot;ForGodsolovedtheworld&quot;. Bingo...I have a 21 character password that I can easily remember.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First a password generator does exactly that&#8230;spits out a string of characters&#8230;that you will never be able to consistently remember correctly. The point to the article (and my post) is that a string of words is easy to remember and gives you the added security because of the overall length of the password. And as far as a password generator spitting out a series of words&#8230;you will be much more likely to remember your own series of words.</p>
<p>One type of password that I have used on some of my accounts is to use a portion of a Bible verse. So, I could take John 3:16 (probably the best known Bible verse) which reads &#8220;For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.&#8221; I will always be able to refer to the verse if I forget the password. I then take just a part of the verse and make the password something like &#8220;ForGodsolovedtheworld&#8221;. Bingo&#8230;I have a 21 character password that I can easily remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petur Williams</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petur Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if the people who know about making passwords secure know that using three or four separate words in a line rather than just stringing together nonsense in upper and lower case alpha numerics is more secure why won&#039;t most password generating software let you do that? My experience is that password generators usually want a single string of characters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the people who know about making passwords secure know that using three or four separate words in a line rather than just stringing together nonsense in upper and lower case alpha numerics is more secure why won&#8217;t most password generating software let you do that? My experience is that password generators usually want a single string of characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Password Complexity - Rod Trent at myITforum.com</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Password Complexity - Rod Trent at myITforum.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/" rel="nofollow">http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Password Complexity vs. Pass Phrase Post &#171; Tim&#8217;s Whiteboard</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Great Password Complexity vs. Pass Phrase Post &#171; Tim&#8217;s Whiteboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]   A very good friend of mine recently posted a great password complexity vs pass phrase article here. That agrees with something I have said for a very long time. I read it first in a series of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   A very good friend of mine recently posted a great password complexity vs pass phrase article here. That agrees with something I have said for a very long time. I read it first in a series of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep...I used to think the same thing. And ten years ago, that wasn&#039;t bad thinking. Back then, a shorter PW with four character sets was very secure. But especially with the advent of rainbow tables, that is very different now. Length is your ONLY protection from a rainbow crack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230;I used to think the same thing. And ten years ago, that wasn&#8217;t bad thinking. Back then, a shorter PW with four character sets was very secure. But especially with the advent of rainbow tables, that is very different now. Length is your ONLY protection from a rainbow crack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cabong</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Cabong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a VERY illuminating article. I&#039;m a network/systems administrator and I&#039;ve always assumed that any combination of upper, lower, number, and special character is bullet proof. Now I can use long passwords that are easier to remember! Excellent tip, thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a VERY illuminating article. I&#8217;m a network/systems administrator and I&#8217;ve always assumed that any combination of upper, lower, number, and special character is bullet proof. Now I can use long passwords that are easier to remember! Excellent tip, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crashsystems</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crashsystems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/password-complexity/#comment-401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point you have there. I always knew that length was important, but I didn&#039;t realize it was &lt;i&gt;that important&lt;/i&gt;. It does make sense though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point you have there. I always knew that length was important, but I didn&#8217;t realize it was <i>that important</i>. It does make sense though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

