<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/</link>
	<description>Jarvis&#039;s Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good clarificatioin Fitz. App-V definitely has much more applications than just what I wrote in the post. Definitely some unknowns with Med-V...and I don&#039;t think it is at all intended to be a replacement to App-V...more of a complimentary solution to bridge what App-V isn&#039;t capable of doing.

First time I saw App-V in action was at MMS 2006 I think (memory is a bit fuzzy). This is before Microsoft bought Softgrid. The Softgrid booth had a computer that was simultaneously running Access 97, 2000, and 2003. That was really impressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good clarificatioin Fitz. App-V definitely has much more applications than just what I wrote in the post. Definitely some unknowns with Med-V&#8230;and I don&#8217;t think it is at all intended to be a replacement to App-V&#8230;more of a complimentary solution to bridge what App-V isn&#8217;t capable of doing.</p>
<p>First time I saw App-V in action was at MMS 2006 I think (memory is a bit fuzzy). This is before Microsoft bought Softgrid. The Softgrid booth had a computer that was simultaneously running Access 97, 2000, and 2003. That was really impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitz</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the blog Jarvis, but I think a couple of things should be clarified - App-v can deal with app to app compatibility issues and will continue to have value there.  It has these benefits in addition to the streaming/updating benefits you described.  And while I don&#039;t know specifically how big a Med-V delivered app will be relative to an App-V delivered app, I think it would be safe to say it will be much larger.  As a result, I think Med-V will have value, but as storage is not unlimited, we won&#039;t see wholesale deliver of every app via Med-V in the future.
-fitz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the blog Jarvis, but I think a couple of things should be clarified &#8211; App-v can deal with app to app compatibility issues and will continue to have value there.  It has these benefits in addition to the streaming/updating benefits you described.  And while I don&#8217;t know specifically how big a Med-V delivered app will be relative to an App-V delivered app, I think it would be safe to say it will be much larger.  As a result, I think Med-V will have value, but as storage is not unlimited, we won&#8217;t see wholesale deliver of every app via Med-V in the future.<br />
-fitz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Turk,
Softgrid has been renamed to App-V. Microsoft bought Softgrid a while back and rolled it into MDOP. It got to version 4.2 before they dropped the Softgrid name. App-V 4.5 is the first version without the Softgrid name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Turk,<br />
Softgrid has been renamed to App-V. Microsoft bought Softgrid a while back and rolled it into MDOP. It got to version 4.2 before they dropped the Softgrid name. App-V 4.5 is the first version without the Softgrid name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Turkington</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Turkington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So...how does that fit in the MS product catalog with Softgrid?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;how does that fit in the MS product catalog with Softgrid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvis back from Virtual Road show – tells why Med-V will beat out App-V - Rod Trent at myITforum.com</title>
		<link>http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis back from Virtual Road show – tells why Med-V will beat out App-V - Rod Trent at myITforum.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verbalprocess.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/#comment-543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it:&#160; http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/  Published Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:54 AM by rodtrent Filed under: Virtualization, App-V, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it:&#160; <a href="http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/" rel="nofollow">http://verbalprocessor.com/2008/10/21/microsoft-enterprise-desktop-virtualization/</a>  Published Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:54 AM by rodtrent Filed under: Virtualization, App-V, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

